ORIGINAL: LixiSoft ORIGINAL: sethmeister LixiSoft, If you had to choose between 1 UAD card vs the Waves SSL which would you go with? Trying hard to decide between the two. SSL would win that call, BUT, I have 3 UAD cards (with all their plugins) and they do things the SSL is not designed for. For a quick all in one track insert the SSL is king, the UAD has plugins that no one else has for the same quality of sound. The Neve EQ, Pulteq EQ, LA2A, 1176, Mastering EQ, Limiter, and the Dimension D are all part of my mix tool kit that I won't give up.

1. Ssl 4000 Torrent
2. Waves Ssl 4000

I was afraid you'd say that To complicate this further, have you heard the URS stuff (class ic console eqs and compressors)? ORIGINAL: Tom Roussell Cakewalk ORIGINAL: kylen Maybe you could just give hime a 10-day timeout or someting?

Otherwise the forum becomes inbred and full of fan-boy rah-rah. Some people just need a little encouragement to improve their vocabulary and communication skills so they present an alternative view! It wasn't his first infraction. Banning his account seemed the appropriate course of action given the circumstances. I did a scan on his previous 10 or so posts.

They were largely negative and confrontational. They did the right thing (imho). I was afraid you'd say that To complicate this further, have you heard the URS stuff (class ic console eqs and compressors)?

Seth I have them (URS).BUT.only because clients bring me sessions with them. They sound good but are not the value (bang for buck wise) the SSL and UAD are. At the present time I think the Waves SSL is the best bang for your buck plugin deal on the market. Oh, and I hate the WUP and the dongle.that said the UAD is one big dongle, and I have a dongle for Nuendo and Pro Tools and.well you get the picture. I keep all my dongles on USB extender cables so I can grab them and go.I carry them from home and to the studio I work at.you can't do that with a UAD card!! ORIGINAL: UnderTow ORIGINAL: jmarkham From my understanding, the Duende uses the same algorithms as the C200 desk which models the 9000 series SSLs.

Waves SSL models the 4000 series. UnderTow The SSL 4000 was op amps.

Around 1985 as i recall. They used the 82E series cards (which you can find on Ebay sometimes. The 9000 series is a hybrid digital/analog.

Jeff I just checked the SSL page on the C200 and it has both the G and E series EQs. I stand corrected. UnderTow the 9000 board is a beautiful sounding unit. SoundWorks in the city (SF) has two 9056's. See: they mix everything thru the board direct to a PT system (which is pretty much used like multitrack tape).

I should call 'em up and ask them if they're gonna get a Duende (buwahaha!!) for my taste, i prefer the nasty old op-amps from the 4000 series. Those circuits were very well balanced and the strip and master compressor is such a classic sound. I think Waves nailed it. ORIGINAL: LixiSoft I was afraid you'd say that To complicate this further, have you heard the URS stuff (class ic console eqs and compressors)? Seth I have them (URS).BUT.only because clients bring me sessions with them. They sound good but are not the value (bang for buck wise) the SSL and UAD are.

At the present time I think the Waves SSL is the best bang for your buck plugin deal on the market. Oh, and I hate the WUP and the dongle.that said the UAD is one big dongle, and I have a dongle for Nuendo and Pro Tools and.well you get the picture.

I keep all my dongles on USB extender cables so I can grab them and go.I carry them from home and to the studio I work at.you can't do that with a UAD card!! True, the UAD is essentially a dongle. I'm actually not too concerned with dongles since I only operate on one DAW. My greatest fear is that I'll buy Waves SSL and be unable to use or even sell the product at some later date after installing a new OS since I.refuse. to pay a yearly WUP fee.

The thing that makes me unsure about UAD is latency and operation w/ Sonar. I assume this is all wrokable but I can't demo it to be able to tell for myself. ORIGINAL: sethmeister ORIGINAL: LixiSoft I was afraid you'd say that To complicate this further, have you heard the URS stuff (class ic console eqs and compressors)?

Seth I have them (URS).BUT.only because clients bring me sessions with them. They sound good but are not the value (bang for buck wise) the SSL and UAD are. At the present time I think the Waves SSL is the best bang for your buck plugin deal on the market. Oh, and I hate the WUP and the dongle.that said the UAD is one big dongle, and I have a dongle for Nuendo and Pro Tools and.well you get the picture.

I keep all my dongles on USB extender cables so I can grab them and go.I carry them from home and to the studio I work at.you can't do that with a UAD card!! True, the UAD is essentially a dongle. I'm actually not too concerned with dongles since I only operate on one DAW. My greatest fear is that I'll buy Waves SSL and be unable to use or even sell the product at some later date after installing a new OS since I.refuse.

to pay a yearly WUP fee. The thing that makes me unsure about UAD is latency and operation w/ Sonar. I assume this is all wrokable but I can't demo it to be able to tell for myself. There is one way to demo uad and that's to order it from a store with a 45 day return policy if your not satisfied.

I admitt this is'nt such a great way but it's the only one. I want to ask Waves SSL users something: Isn't it annoying going back to not being able to graphically see what you're doing? I've gotten so used to graphical displays of compression and particularly EQ-ing, that I think I'd be uncomfortable without it. That is one downside with the SSL Plugs but I also do lots of mixing on analog boards which don't have GUIs.

Even though I have UAD, other Waves, I really like the sound of the SSL4000. But it is also a relatively 'new toy' for me so maybe my opinion will change over time but even if I just use it for drums it will be worth the investment. SSL would win that call, BUT, I have 3 UAD cards (with all their plugins) and they do things the SSL is not designed for. For a quick all in one track insert the SSL is king, the UAD has plugins that no one else has for the same quality of sound. The Neve EQ, Pulteq EQ, LA2A, 1176, Mastering EQ, Limiter, and the Dimension D are all part of my mix tool kit that I won't give up. Hey Lixi, if you haven't already, could you not create a channel strip track template with all the UA plugs that would suit your needs?

Ssl 4000 Torrent

BTW, I'm all for choices in high end gear, the SSL plugs are pretty interesting. Tried to download the demo so I could hear them for myself. Well I was anable to. Here's why I won't be buying Waves SSL Bundle: 1. PACE protected. You need an iLok just to run the demo! Have to buy into and pay up anually to keep using it!

Cripes, the thing is already $750 for chrissakes. They want to keep milking me for more? It's a shame when they release a great product (taking y'all's word for it) and sour the deal this way. If it weren't for the B.S. I'd buy them in a second. I'll stick to my UAD-1s.

ORIGINAL: Boogie 1. PACE protected. You need an iLok just to run the demo! Have to buy into and pay up anually to keep using it!

I am in the market for some higher end plugins/hardware for mixing and mastering. I feel ambivalent about Waves for the basically the same reasons, esp. The WUP and Ilok.

The price for the SSL bundle is not really the issue for me, and the dongle per se is not a problem, as I have a Steinberg Key for Wavelab 6, however my only experience with Pace (an earlier Izotope Ozone demo installed it before they took it out), was NOT good. Got the blue screens, etc.

I thought the ILok was supposed to eliminate the need for Pace modifiying the MBR, or whatever it does. Anyone had any system problems with Ilok and Waves? I understand this is not the regular Ilok but a special version for Waves? Anyone using the TC Powercore for the Finalizer plugin? The hardware Finalizer is a bit out of my price range, but is supposed to be pretty nice. How does it compare to the UAD-1 with all the goodies, like the Ultra Pak?

ORIGINAL: jsaras Has anybody stacked the SSL bus comp against Voxengo's Marquis Compressor? As I recall, the Marquis has an SSL mode in it. I know that it's probably not meant to emulate the same board but I wonder if they're in the same ballpark sonically. Would love to study the difference myself between the two, I'm hoping someone uploads files, for some of us are in no position to demo, i don't think buying a ilock (specially made for waves only) for a product we may not want is a great solution.

So to upload files for some of us to listen to and compare is all we can hope for. I don't only want to hear the compressor but the ssl eq as well.

So if someone who owns the ssl bundle don't mind posting files please do. ORIGINAL: Boogie Tried to download the demo so I could hear them for myself.

Well I was anable to. Here's why I won't be buying Waves SSL Bundle: 1. PACE protected. You need an iLok just to run the demo!

Wheel configurator. C) Java Runtime Environment version 1.4 or higher for OM configurator tool. You can download the OM tool and the tftp image from the following location: or you can use the tool provided – OMM Activation CD. Assigning an IP address to. Password: 22222. If you do not have this information then you will need to either reset or acquire this login information. Unfortunately we would not be able to provide support on this topic. You may however visit the Aastra support page for your specific device. Once logged in you should see a screen similar to.

Have to buy into and pay up anually to keep using it! Cripes, the thing is already $750 for chrissakes.

They want to keep milking me for more? It's a shame when they release a great product (taking y'all's word for it) and sour the deal this way.

Waves Ssl 4000

If it weren't for the B.S. I'd buy them in a second. I'll stick to my UAD-1s.

Think of the UAD-1 as an iLok in a PCI slot. Because that's about all the acceleration they do;-) and to correct your WUP statement. You do not need the WUP to use the product. The iLok license has no expiration and you may use it in perpetuity. However, after one year, you are not entitled to upgrades or enhancements to the product. You need to sign up for the WUP to get on-going support and upgrades. I don't have a problem with this.

I have to buy Sonar 6 when it comes out. And Cake stops enhancing one release back. The WUP is a more explicit. But very similar support model.

If you're happy with your current product. Keep using it.you don't have to do the WUP unless you choose to. ORIGINAL: Sid Viscous Well, if you have to use the crack because the company sucks.

The fact that it's fairly standard practice nowadays to buy Waves but use the cracks is an absurdly obvious point that: a) Their copy protection schema is not working and b) Their copy protection schema is not working! Still, if they keep makin' them, I'll take a look at them. But since the options are on the table it's a little scary. And with Voxengo coming in fast with alternatives that are consistently eyebrow raising, I think it would be best to ditch the darned dongle and get a little more intimate with their user base.